USA: The Supreme Court has set back on Trump in the trial over the attack on Capitol.

On January 6, 2021, the US Supreme Court rejected the way to transfer documents related to Trump’s actions to the Congressional Commission of Inquiry, which was accused of highlighting his role in the attack on Capitol.

The U.S. Supreme Court, by a majority of eight judges out of nine, rejected the former president’s attempt, saying the secrecy of the White House archives did not explain his intentions.

These hundreds of page documents include lists of people who met or invited him on January 6, 2021, and notes taken during these exchanges.

The Supreme Court ruling represents a significant victory for the “special committee” of the House of Representatives involved in the actual judicial guerrilla war with the former president and his relatives.

Members of the commission, mostly Democrats, played the role of the Republican billionaire in the attack on the Congress seat by thousands of his supporters, and elected officials confirmed the victory of his Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, in the presidential election.

When Republicans regain control of the House and bury their work, they run against time because they desperately want to publish their findings within a year, before the midterm elections.

Former President’s Lawyers, Advisors, Former Chief Executive, Spokespersons …

Among those recently invited was former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, a staunch supporter of Donald Trump and his supporter in the post-election crusade.

“Not the king”

Donald Trump has not ruled out running for president in 2024 from the center of his camp, condemning a “political game” and trying to thwart the commission’s efforts.

See also  Ukraine's top security official arrested for fraud | the world

To do this, it is important to note the uniqueness of the executive branch, which enables it to protect the confidentiality of communications between its members. According to him, this also applies to former presidents.

However, the federal courts rejected his request, and the current executive branch dismissed the use of this privilege and authorized the sending of its archives to Congress.

“Presidents are not kings and plaintiffs are not presidents”, specifically Magistrate Tanya Sutkan, who ruled in the judgment of the first instance and later affirmed on appeal.

The Supreme Court, consisting of three of the nine magistrates appointed by Donald Trump, upheld the verdicts. Conservative Judge Clarence Thomas said only he would have been satisfied.

Filed in a separate court, the former real estate boss also saw the sky darken. On Tuesday evening, the New York State Attorney General announced that “fraudulent” tax procedures within the Trump organization had “revealed evidence.”

In a document of more than a hundred pages, Letidia James accused him and his two children of misappropriating some of their property in order to gain “economic advantage”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *