The Pixel 7 Pro Not much different from Pixel 6 Pro When comparing specifications and design. The two phones can easily be mistaken for just releasing them months Regardless of one year, the address numbers are very similar. This means that few people might think the Pixel 7 Pro isn’t a good upgrade, or that Google has slowly pushed out the same phone with a few small changes to make some quick money.
While it remains to be seen if the Pixel 7 Pro is a worthwhile upgrade, any perception that Google has been lazy is wrong. Not changing the Pixel 6 Pro, it’s all the best decision the company could make, and I’m very pleased to see a phone out and on the spec sheet, not drastic, expensive, and ultimately pointless a redesign. However, there is one important thing that seems to be overlooked, and it may hurt the Pixel 7 Pro’s long-term success.
Please don’t change it
The simple reason I find Google’s “lazy” treatment of the Pixel 7 Pro most welcome is that the Pixel 6 Pro is the best smartphone the company has ever made. Not wanting to change the basic design or key specs is the mature thing to do, and there seems to be a one-off focus on building a well-known smartphone brand, rather than relying on its name to convince a struggling and hardware-laden audience to choose Google’s phone over any other.
It achieved a great design with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, with its smooth back panel, eyebrow-like camera module, attractive and cool colors, and a choice of screen sizes with a flat or curved profile. It is impossible to mistake a file Pixel 6 Or the 6 Pro for any other smartphone, and that’s still a rare feat these days due to the ever-increasing product ranges. By contrast, Pixel phones were 1-5 Too bleak and indescribable The way they looked, you could easily forget that you were. one decadenot to mention recognizing him on twenty steps.
Google’s decision is one that is taken straight from Apple’s time-tested and tried-and-true rulebook. The iPhone 14 Pro It looks very similar to iPhone 13 Pro and the iPhone 12 Proand even borrows the basis of its design from iPhone 4 And the Iphone 5. You know what you’re looking at when you see an iPhone. When Apple eventually changes the design of the iPhone again, it will almost certainly stick with it for a few years because it understands the value of owning a well-known brand, and the negative financial hit associated with changing the design annually.
The Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro were design successes, and there’s no point in changing the design just for it. It’s the opposite. The more pixels we see, whether it’s Pixel 6 or Pixel 7 series devices, the more people associate Google’s name with being a great smartphone brand, and the more people might actually buy one of these excellent devices. And see phones in person, as you can do with Pixel 7 and 7 Pro hands-onThis point becomes clearer.
New/old specs are good
Is the Pixel 7 Pro an excellent device? After all, the basic specs read very similarly to the Pixel 6 Pro, so doesn’t that make them “outdated?” no not like that. Let’s be realistic here. The 6.7-inch LTPO OLED display with a resolution of 3120 x 1440 pixels and a refresh rate of 120Hz is just as sophisticated as it was on last year’s Pixel 6 Pro. Realistically, what changes could be made to make it “better”? I’ll give you a moment to think about it, but it just doesn’t make sense, since there isn’t any.
The Pixel 7 Pro weighs roughly the same as the 6 Pro, as are the overall dimensions, plus there’s an in-display fingerprint sensor, 5G connectivity, IP68 water and dust resistance, Gorilla Glass Victus, multiple sensors, speakers, and microphones. All cameras have the same number of megapixels as the Pixel 6 Pro, and the only major internal change is the use of the new Tensor 2 . processor Instead of Tensor 1. Far from adding tricks, there’s really no place for Google to dramatically improve the core specs, and like the design, there’s no real need for either.
If you’re wondering why I’m not advocating more changes over a phone released a year ago, it’s because Google’s expertise is always in the software. All those same specs made the Pixel 6 Pro software shine, and the change to Tensor 2 should highlight the year’s worth of software developments expected from Google, which is where the magic of the Pixel 7 Pro will almost certainly be found. Previous Pixel phones did the same thing, but the design wasn’t right until the Pixel 6 Pro.
Why didn’t you change this thing?
Not veering too far from the 6 Pro’s design or core specs, and instead loading it up with silicon and new Google software, we hope it makes the Pixel 7 Pro another winner. However, striving to balance the same thing with desire can be intoxicating and addictive, and partly about the Pixel 7 Pro makes me fear Google has taken it too far.
A 5,000mAh battery powers the Pixel 7 Pro, and there’s a 30W fast charge that reaches 50% in 30 minutes. It’s the same Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, which were definitely not battery stars, and Google once again claims “all-day battery life” for the Pixel 7 Pro as if it was a good thing. I hate to Google it up, but that’s not good enough, and while I’m happy to advocate not messing with a perfectly good screen and security tech, battery life needs a fix for the new series.
I will happily defend Google’s decision not to tamper with the design or raise specs in vain.
Do not do it he is Lazy, 50% recharge time in 30 minutes Not fast by today’s standards. Adding an Extreme Battery Saver mode for 72 hours of claimed use, without some features, including active 5G, doesn’t eliminate it either. Seeing the 24-hour battery life stats for the second year in a row means the Tensor 2 hasn’t gotten any more efficient, which is disappointing after seeing significant improvements in this area recently between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
I will gladly defend Google’s decision not to tamper with the design or not overstate the already excellent specs, primarily so that it can focus on providing us with the best of its software expertise. But I can’t shout any arguments, for now, it doesn’t seem like Google has put much effort into making the battery last longer. The formula is true almost everywhere else, and I really hope the poor battery tech and mediocre charging don’t get in the way of what’s shaping up to be a great second act in the revitalized Pixel line.
Editors’ Recommendations
“Typical beer trailblazer. Hipster-friendly web buff. Certified alcohol fanatic. Internetaholic. Infuriatingly humble zombie lover.”