The United States and Britain have been saying since Wednesday that Russia could use chemical weapons in Ukraine.
Russia is considering this situation, according to them, Moscow, Washington and Kiev internationally banned Ukraine accuses the management of laboratories intended for the production of biological and chemical weapons.
Despite strong objections from Kiev and Washington, the UN Security Council convened an emergency meeting on Friday at 3:00 pm GMT time on the matter at the request of Moscow.
“The Kremlin is deliberately spreading blatant lies that the United States and Ukraine are carrying out chemical and biological weapons operations in Ukraine,” US Secretary of State Nate Price said Wednesday.
Moscow had already accused in 2018 that the United States was secretly conducting biological experiments in a laboratory in Georgia, another former Soviet republic that aims to join NATO and the European Union, as well as Ukraine.
There are sites in the country that can give themselves to false flag attacks: there are “biological research facilities” in Ukraine, US Ambassador Victoria Nuland confirmed number three, stressing that the United States “is now very concerned about the potential of Russian forces”. Trying to control it “.
The Russians begin by saying that their opponents or the Americans have stockpiled chemical weapons, so when they themselves use chemical weapons, as I fear, they have a kind of Maskrovka “- refers to the Russian word art. Deceiving the enemy – “a ready-made lie”, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told a plethora on Wednesday.
Russia is one of the 198 signatories to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which came into force in 1997 and has officially completed 100% destruction of its 40,000 tons of chemical weapons.
But in recent years, Westerners have accused neuroscientists in Moscow of using poison ivy in two toxic cases, targeting now-imprisoned adversary Alexei Navalny (2020) and former Russian spy Sergei Skribal, UK (2018).
Russia has also shown satisfaction with the Damascus regime by refusing to use chemical weapons repeatedly against Syrian civilians.
These crimes have largely gone unpunished. In 2013, US President Barack Obama (2009-2017) made it a “red line” and dropped sanctions on Syria.
The hypothesis of the use of chemical weapons in Ukraine also worries France, while the Russian military has not achieved the expected success.
The Russian invasion, which began on February 24, was “a demonstration of Russia’s strength, and vice versa. The letter was sent to his public officials on Wednesday.
“Vladimir Putin did not enter this war to lose. In the event of a stalemate or humiliation, the use of dirty weapons or tactical nuclear weapons is one of the possibilities,” said an unnamed senior official.
Mathieu Boulègue, a Russian expert at the British think tank Saddam House, argues that “Russia has failed to enter the war. We must save face for the Kremlin.” “Chemistry is a vector he can use well. It’s not impossible.”
In Ukraine, chemical weapons are “intended to intimidate civilians and make them flee, but they are not a weapon to change the face of the war.
Olivier Leibniz, an expert in chemical weapons, is an associate researcher at the Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS) who is very careful.
“We will take further action on terrorism, hence the denial of international public opinion, which risks strengthening the already very severe sanctions,” he told the judges.
“Total coffee junkie. Tv ninja. Unapologetic problem solver. Beer expert.”